The professor stood motionless at the center of the grand courtroom, a magnificent skeleton of democracy now hollowed and repurposed. Sunlight filtered through tall windows, casting elongated shadows across the polished marble floor, illuminating dust particles that danced in the air like fleeting memories of justice. The imposing columns that once symbolized the strength of an impartial legal system now loomed as silent sentinels of oppression. The professor’s eyes traced the national seal still proudly displayed on the wall—an artifact of forgotten ideals, as relevant now as archaeological curiosities in a museum of extinct civilizations.
This was not a trial in any meaningful sense of the word. This was theater—a carefully orchestrated performance with a predetermined conclusion. The audience knew their parts; the actors had rehearsed their lines. The ritual served a singular purpose: to demonstrate the Circle’s absolute control over truth itself.
The prosecutor paced before the bench, his Italian leather shoes clicking rhythmically against the marble. His voice possessed the practiced cadence of a televangelist, rising and falling with hypnotic precision. “The defendant has committed crimes against the moral foundation of our society,” he declared, requiring no evidence beyond his own conviction. His suit was impeccably tailored, his tie the precise shade of crimson favored by those in the inner circles of power. He did not need to present facts; in this new world, accusations from the right lips were evidence enough.
On the elevated platform, Judge Harmon presided with the detached serenity of a man who had made peace with his role in this machinery. He had once been respected for his careful interpretations of contractual disputes and property law. Now he sat draped in the black robes of his office like a priest of some dark religion, his face a mask of solemn authority. Ten years ago, he had been appointed during the first wave of judicial reforms. Five years ago, he had started attending the Circle’s private retreats. Now, he ruled not by law but by loyalty—a loyalty that had been rewarded with a lakeside mansion and a son who had mysteriously risen to prominence in the energy sector despite lacking any relevant qualifications.
The defense attorney—if one could call him that—stood hunched at his table, shuffling papers that contained nothing of consequence. His name was Giles, a deliberate choice by the system: a man known for losing cases, for fumbling arguments, for sweating profusely under the slightest scrutiny. His suit hung loosely on his frame, purchased off the rack from a department store that still catered to the middle class. When he spoke, his voice cracked like an adolescent’s, his arguments falling flat in the acoustically perfect chamber.
“My client has dedicated his life to education,” Giles offered weakly, his eyes never meeting those of the judge or the jury. “His writings, while perhaps controversial, fall well within the protected speech outlined in the—” He stopped himself, aware that invoking the old constitution was itself becoming a dangerous act. Instead, he mumbled something about character witnesses and community service before sinking back into his chair.
The professor observed this pantomime with clinical detachment. Professor Elliot Reed, once chair of Political Philosophy at the nation’s most prestigious university, author of texts that had been standard reading just three years ago. Now those same books were being removed from libraries, scrubbed from digital archives, their physical copies collected during the “literary health inspections” that had become routine in residential areas.
The gallery behind him was filled to capacity. In the front rows sat the Christian Nationalist contingent, their presence made obvious by the small golden crosses pinned to their lapels—the unofficial symbol that had become increasingly official. The women among them wore modest dresses with high necklines, their hair uniformly long and often covered with delicate scarves. The men sat rigid in dark suits, their expressions beatific, as if witnessing a religious sacrament rather than a legal proceeding. Behind them sat the Circle’s observers, distinguishable by their digital tablets and the subtle earpieces that kept them connected to their superiors.
The transformation of the courts had been methodical, a precision strike against the foundations of democracy. It began with the appointments—judges selected not for their legal acumen but for their ideological purity and willingness to serve. The vetting process, once centered on qualifications and judicial philosophy, now included private interviews with Circle representatives and Christian Nationalist leaders. Judicial nominees who showed any hesitation about the new direction were quietly removed from consideration. Those who advanced were those who understood the unspoken arrangement: power in exchange for loyalty.
The early rulings seemed innocuous to those not paying attention. Procedural decisions that slightly favored corporate interests. Small erosions of privacy rights in the name of security. Restrictive interpretations of protest laws that made it increasingly difficult to demonstrate against government policies. Each ruling built upon the last, creating a framework that bent further and further away from equality under the law.
The Circle—that loose coalition of tech billionaires, media moguls, energy tycoons, and fundamentalist leaders—had recognized the judiciary as the perfect weapon. Legislatures could be stalled; executive orders could be challenged; but judicial rulings carried the weight of finality. By the time Professor Reed published his analysis of this legal deterioration, the machinery was already too far advanced to be stopped through conventional means.
The abortion bans came first, state by state, until the Supreme Court—now packed with Circle loyalists—delivered the ruling that invalidated decades of precedent. They called it “Returning to Constitutional Foundations,” a name that somehow transformed regression into restoration. Within months, women began dying from preventable complications. A sixteen-year-old girl in Oklahoma hemorrhaged to death after doctors refused to complete a miscarriage, fearing prosecution. A mother of three in Georgia was charged with second-degree murder after a stillbirth revealed trace amounts of a prescription medication in the fetal tissue. The Christian Nationalists celebrated these tragedies as “divine justice,” while the Circle’s media apparatus spun narratives of moral restoration and traditional values.
The LGBTQ community was next. The Defense of Family Act was comprehensive in its cruelty. Same-sex marriages were invalidated overnight; adoption rights revoked; anti-discrimination protections eliminated. The Circle’s propaganda labeled it “protection of natural order.” Schools purged their libraries of any book featuring non-heterosexual relationships. Teachers were fired for acknowledging the existence of gay family members. Teenagers were sent to “reorientation camps” by court order after their parents reported them for “deviant tendencies.”
While personal freedoms collapsed, corporate power expanded exponentially. The courts systematically dismantled regulations that had protected workers, consumers, and the environment. The “Economic Liberty Restoration Act” eliminated most forms of corporate liability. When a chemical plant owned by a Circle member leaked toxins into a town’s water supply, the resulting class action suit was dismissed before discovery could begin. The judge cited the new precedent that corporate decision-making constituted protected speech. Five hundred people died; no one was held accountable.
Campaign finance laws were the next casualty. The landmark “Citizens United” decision of 2010 now seemed quaint compared to the “Financial Expression Protection Act” of 2023, which eliminated virtually all restrictions on political spending. Elections became nakedly transactional. Candidates openly received direct payments from corporations and wealthy individuals, calling them “investments in governance” rather than bribes. Public campaign funding was eliminated as “wasteful spending.” The Circle’s candidates ran unopposed or against token opposition in most districts.
As wealth solidified its control over the political process, the judiciary itself became increasingly corrupt. Judges attended luxury retreats sponsored by the corporations whose cases they adjudicated. Supreme Court justices accepted “consulting fees” from Circle members. Lower court judges who delivered favorable rulings found their children admitted to prestigious universities or offered lucrative positions at Circle-owned companies. It was no longer corruption; it was simply how the system worked.
The Christian Nationalists provided the moral framework for this transformation. Their theology, once considered fringe even among evangelicals, became the de facto state religion. The courts ruled that public schools could require daily prayer sessions. Religious exemptions expanded until entire industries could opt out of any regulation by citing faith-based objections. Divorce became nearly impossible without church approval. Birth control was restricted based on “religious freedom” grounds, available only to married women with their husband’s notarized consent.
Women’s rights deteriorated in parallel with religious ascendancy. New laws classified women according to their reproductive status. Those of “childbearing age” faced restrictions on certain professions deemed hazardous to fertility. A woman who left an abusive husband could be legally compelled to return under the “Family Preservation Statutes.” Female employees could be terminated for becoming pregnant or for failing to become pregnant within a certain timeframe after marriage. The courts upheld these measures as consistent with “natural law and the promotion of demographic stability.”
Professor Reed had documented all of this. His final publication, “The Judicial Coup: How the Rule of Law Became the Rule of Power,” had circulated briefly before being classified as seditious material. In it, he meticulously traced the connections between Circle members and judicial decisions, the flow of money through shell organizations to judges’ personal accounts, the coordinated media campaigns that normalized each new restriction. The response was swift. His university position was eliminated; his home was raided; his digital presence erased. And now, after months in pre-trial detention, he stood in this mockery of a courtroom, awaiting the inevitable.
Judge Harmon cleared his throat, drawing all eyes to his elevated position. The room fell to a reverential hush as he adjusted his reading glasses.
“Having considered the evidence presented by the prosecution, and the arguments offered by the defense, this court finds the defendant, Elliot Reed, guilty of sedition, intellectual terrorism, and moral corruption of youth.” His voice was flat, devoid of any emotion that might suggest this was a matter of consequence rather than administrative routine. “The defendant has used his position of academic influence to undermine the foundational values of our society, to question the divinely inspired legal framework of our nation, and to incite resistance against lawful authority.”
The Christian Nationalist contingent nodded in solemn agreement. A woman in the front row closed her eyes and raised her hand slightly, as if receiving a blessing.
“For these crimes,” Judge Harmon continued, “the defendant is sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole, to be served at the North Central Rehabilitation Facility.” He struck his gavel once, the sound reverberating through the chamber like a gunshot.
The professor did not react. This moment had been written months ago, perhaps years ago when he first began to document the corruption. The guards moved forward, their uniforms crisp and black, adorned with the small silver emblem of the Circle. As they placed the handcuffs on his wrists, Professor Reed caught the eye of a young woman in the back row—a former student, perhaps, or simply someone who recognized what was happening. Her face registered a momentary flash of horror before smoothing into the blank expression that had become the default of survival.
The procession moved toward the side door, away from the main entrance where media representatives would be waiting to broadcast the approved narrative. There would be no appeals, no further legal maneuvers. The system that might have provided such options no longer existed except as a façade.
Outside the courthouse, daily life continued. The streets were clean and orderly. People moved with purpose, their eyes focused ahead or on their approved devices. The Circle’s latest entertainment release had just dropped, and conversations focused on plot twists rather than judicial ones. Advertisements promised prosperity through compliance. News broadcasts highlighted the Chairman’s latest public appearance, where he had announced an increased birth subsidy for “traditional families” and a new initiative to detect “ideological contamination” in educational institutions.
In his chambers, Judge Harmon removed his robes and poured himself a glass of scotch from a crystal decanter—a gift from a grateful energy executive whose environmental violations had been dismissed last month. On his desk lay the docket for tomorrow: another professor, another journalist, another voice that had spoken when silence was expected. His schedule for the weekend included a private retreat at a Circle member’s mountain estate, where the next phase of judicial reforms would be discussed. He sipped his scotch and gazed at the painting on his wall—a reproduction of “Justice” by Giotto, the blindfolded woman with scales now seeming less like an ideal and more like a joke only the powerful were privileged to understand.
Discover more from AJB Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
