The truth about the Chairman had been obscured long before the masses could perceive it, much like the way Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia—or was it Eurasia? By the time the first concrete evidence materialized in the spring of 2025, the damage to the republic had already metastasized beyond salvation. There had been murmurs, of course, scattered throughout the years like breadcrumbs leading to a sinister destination: classified intelligence reports buried in bureaucratic vaults, clandestine meetings in Eastern European hotels, inexplicable pivots in foreign policy that contradicted decades of American doctrine. The Chairman was an aberration in the political landscape, a figure who by all rational calculation should have remained a footnote in history rather than its author. Yet there he sat behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, his corpulent fingers tracing the wood grain of power, a mirthless smile playing across his features as though privy to a cosmic joke at humanity’s expense.
The seduction of America had been executed with almost insulting simplicity. The nation, already fractured by generational divides, ideological trenches, and economic disparities, had virtually surrendered itself to him. The populace remained too entangled in the distraction machinery—algorithmic feeds designed to provoke outrage, celebrity melodramas manufactured to occupy mental bandwidth, cultural skirmishes engineered to exhaust moral energy—to notice the systematic dismantling of democratic guardrails happening in plain sight. While citizens raged about sporting controversies and dissected the latest streaming entertainment, the institutional pillars of their republic corroded silently beneath them.
Initially, many analysts mistook the Chairman’s behavior for mere incompetence—a narcissistic businessman playing at governance, treating international diplomacy as another season of the reality television that had made him a household name. He embraced autocrats with unseemly enthusiasm, belittled traditional allies with adolescent insults, and issued policy proclamations with the capriciousness of a temperamental deity, seemingly delighting in the resultant destabilization. Each day brought fresh chaos, new scandals, unprecedented violations of norms that had once seemed inviolable. The spectacle was mesmerizing; the Chairman had transformed governance into theater, and the ratings were unprecedented.
But patterns emerged for those trained to recognize them, just as Winston Smith had learned to detect the subtle manipulations in the historical archives. The Chairman’s unwavering reverence for certain strongmen, particularly the stone-faced master of the Kremlin. The unexplained reversals on matters of vital national security. His peculiar eagerness to fracture NATO, to question the value of democratic alliances forged in the crucible of the Cold War, while simultaneously extending diplomatic courtesies to nations that had openly worked to undermine American interests. Most telling were the private conversations—the meetings from which even senior staff were excluded, the whispered exchanges in Helsinki, Singapore, and other global capitals that left veteran intelligence officers with a familiar chill of recognition. The infamous summit in Helsinki stood as the most brazen display, where he stood beside Russia’s leader, hands clasped before him like a chastened schoolboy, publicly rejecting his own intelligence community’s assessment in favor of the word of a former KGB officer.
Media outlets expressed shock. Political commentators unleashed torrents of condemnation. But for the dwindling few who remained untethered from the manufactured reality, it merely confirmed what had long been suspected.
The Chairman wasn’t simply inept. He wasn’t merely corrupt. He was owned.
The FSB—successor to the KGB and guardian of Russia’s clandestine interests—had identified the Chairman as a potential asset decades earlier, when his business empire first began showing signs of financial distress. Their psychological profile had been impeccable: a man consumed by vanity yet crippled by insecurity, greedy yet chronically overextended, ambitious yet pathologically averse to the disciplines of genuine success. When American financial institutions finally recognized the Chairman as a liability and severed their relationships with him, FSB-connected oligarchs appeared with timely infusions of capital, routed through a labyrinth of shell companies in Cyprus, Malta, and the Cayman Islands.
“Just business,” they assured him in accent-heavy English, vodka glasses raised in penthouses overlooking Moscow. “Mutually beneficial arrangement, yes?”
The Chairman, relieved to maintain his gilded façade of success, failed to recognize the invisible chains being forged with each transaction. The FSB operatives—men like Dmitri Volkov and Sergei Koslov, whose names never appeared in official documents but who materialized regularly in the Chairman’s proximity—didn’t need to threaten or coerce. They simply needed to ensure he understood the precariousness of his position, the fragility of his empire should certain financial arrangements be exposed.
“We have always admired American business acumen,” Volkov once remarked during a late-night meeting in a Trump property, his smile never reaching his eyes. “Such creativity with numbers. Such flexible approaches to valuation. Our tax authorities would not be so understanding, I think.”
The Chairman laughed nervously, reaching for another glass of mineral water while the Russians drank freely.
Kompromat—compromising material—was the FSB’s specialty, an art form perfected over generations. Financial entanglements formed the foundation, but there were other layers: the infamous Moscow hotel incident captured on surveillance equipment, the recorded conversations in which the Chairman disparaged his own supporters, the documented connections to figures whose associations would destroy him in certain constituencies. None of it needed to be deployed; its mere existence was sufficient leverage.
The FSB’s handlers operated with surgical precision. They didn’t need to control every action or decision—only the ones that mattered to Moscow’s strategic interests. They allowed the Chairman his petty vindictiveness, his personal vendettas, his theatrical provocations. These distractions served their purpose, creating a smokescreen behind which the real work could proceed: the systematic weakening of Western alliances, the delegitimization of democratic institutions, the erosion of America’s moral authority on the global stage.
Colonel Alexei Petrov, the FSB officer assigned overall responsibility for the Chairman operation, explained it to his superiors with characteristic bluntness: “We do not need him to love Russia. We need him to damage America. The rest is noise.”
The operation’s greatest strength lay in its apparent absurdity. The notion that a sitting American president could be effectively controlled by a foreign intelligence service seemed so outlandish, so fundamentally at odds with perceived reality, that those who suggested it were immediately dismissed as conspiracy theorists or partisan extremists. The Chairman himself promoted this defensive mechanism, repeatedly dismissing any scrutiny as a “witch hunt” or “fake news.”
Those who worked closely with the Chairman sensed something was amiss but struggled to articulate their unease. National Security Advisor Jonathan Mills had once walked into the Oval Office unannounced, finding the Chairman hastily ending a call, his expression uncharacteristically serious. When questioned, he snapped, “Just talking to some people about real estate. Beautiful property. The best.” Mills noted in his private journal that evening: “Something feels wrong. Like watching someone perform a role they haven’t quite mastered.”
The most visible manifestation occurred on a spring morning in the Oval Office. Against established protocol, the White House press corps had been barred from attending a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Only Russian state media were permitted to document the encounter. The resulting photographs showed the Chairman grinning expansively, seemingly oblivious to the optics of sharing classified intelligence with representatives of a nation that had interfered in American elections.
Later that day, a White House aide overheard fragments of conversation between the departing Russians: “He gave us more than we asked for,” Lavrov murmured, amusement evident in his tone. “Easier than training a circus animal.”
The next morning’s headlines screamed outrage. Congressional leaders demanded explanations. Intelligence officials quietly updated damage assessments. But by afternoon, a fresh controversy had erupted—something involving a celebrity feud or an inflammatory tweet—and public attention shifted accordingly. The pattern repeated with metronomic predictability: outrage, distraction, forgetfulness, acceptance.
The true genius of the operation lay not in traditional espionage but in psychological warfare applied domestically. Colonel Petrov had studied the theoretical works of Yuri Bezmenov, a Soviet defector who had outlined a four-stage model for subverting enemy nations: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization. The Chairman served as the perfect catalyst for accelerating this process, particularly the critical demoralization phase.
“The goal,” Petrov explained to his FSB colleagues during a strategy session in a secure Moscow facility, “is not merely to confuse them but to break their collective ability to distinguish truth from falsehood. When everything can be denied, when reality itself becomes negotiable, resistance becomes impossible.”
The Chairman instinctively understood this dynamic. He recognized that the secret to maintaining power wasn’t suppressing scandals but proliferating them until they lost all meaning. Not one impropriety but dozens; not a single violation but a constant barrage of transgressions that exhausted the public’s capacity for outrage. He cultivated a base of supporters for whom allegiance to him transcended traditional political loyalty, becoming instead a form of identity—a psychological investment too significant to abandon without threatening one’s entire conception of self.
“They’ll defend anything,” he boasted to his inner circle. “I could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue.” The room had laughed nervously, uncertain whether he was joking.
He wasn’t.
The Chairman’s supporters were methodically conditioned to reject external information sources, to view journalists as enemies of the people, to interpret every investigation as persecution, every criticism as evidence of a deep state conspiracy. Each revelation that might have toppled previous administrations was reflexively dismissed, each damning piece of evidence rationalized away. The psychological framework was elegant in its simplicity: admitting any single impropriety would threaten the entire narrative structure upon which their worldview now depended.
The FSB monitored this domestic division with satisfaction. “We could not have designed a better societal fracture if we had tried for fifty years,” Petrov noted in a classified assessment. “They are destroying themselves with a passion we could never inspire externally.”
By 2025, the Chairman had accomplished what decades of Soviet and Russian strategy had failed to achieve: the fundamental destabilization of American democracy from within. He had transformed political discourse into tribal warfare, corrupted institutions designed to check executive power, weaponized information itself. All while maintaining the thin veneer of legitimacy that prevented outright resistance.
The cruelest revelation came in the Chairman’s final days in power, as investigations closed in and options narrowed. His most devoted followers—those who had sacrificed relationships, compromised principles, even risked legal jeopardy to defend him—discovered what the FSB had always known: the Chairman’s loyalty extended precisely as far as his self-interest.
When these supporters, facing consequences for actions taken at his behest, sought his intervention, they encountered only indifference. “I never told them to do anything illegal,” he said dismissively to an aide. “Very sad situation, but not my problem.”
Then he turned away, attention already shifting to his next scheme, his next performance.
In a secured FSB facility outside Moscow, Colonel Petrov raised a glass with his colleagues. On the screen before them, American news networks showed citizens screaming at each other in the streets, institutions paralyzed by partisan obstruction, the republic’s foundations cracked beyond simple repair.
“To the Chairman,” Petrov said, his voice tinged with professional admiration. “Russia’s greatest asset.”
The glasses clinked as America burned.
Russia had indeed never needed to fire a single shot.
Discover more from AJB Blog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
